What They Really Meant To Say…

What he meant to sayScreenshot 2014-06-29 14.51.19

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “What They Really Meant To Say…

  1. Bill seems to be misunderstanding things (again):

    WMS Radio Network @wmsbroadcasting · 10h

    What I don’t respect is their criticizing me for asking questions and demanding answers while asking questions and demanding answers.

    Bill, you don’t seem to understand the difference here. Mike has asked you a number of questions (as has others) and has said he will continue asking these questions until you answer them. There is no “demand”. You can choose to answer them or continue to be embarassed. There is no “or else”. He didn’t say, “If you don’t answer my questions to my satisfaction, I’m going to call the authorities and tell them you may be a danger to yourself or others.” Nor would he.

    You, on the other hand, ask questions with an expiration time and an “or else” attached. IOW, a direct threat to the person asked.

    Two very, very different things here Bill.

  2. Oh dear, it looks like Bill doesn’t like being ignored by the “cool kids”:


    WMS Radio Network @wmsbroadcasting · 1h

    If @runwolf13 wants to sit and gossip with his little palsy walsies, who am I to give a shit? Gossip away. Seriously. Have fun. Enjoy.

    “Palsy walsies”?

    Really? Over a half dozen or so posts over the course of a day?

    Can “poopy head” be far behind?

  3. Think some of the real subtle nuances escaped you, Michael.

    I have a right to pose questions to others publicly or privately, and they have a duty to answer all MY questions within my deadlines whereas others have no right to ask the great ME questions even on their own blogs, nor do I have a duty to answer ANY such questions at any time.

    Oh and by the way, it is very unfair to hide questions addressed to me in a blog post to which I am responding. I am excused from the pedestrian need to understand what I am responding to.

Comments are closed.